Here’s a fun comparison:
What would Churchill’s soaring oratory look like in the hands of today’s typical corporate exec?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Toward an intuitive sense of what is linguistically appropriate.
What I Blog About
- Aaron Sorkin (3)
- Abbreviations (3)
- Academic Writing (2)
- Adjectives (1)
- Adverbs (2)
- Ampersands (1)
- Analogies (4)
- Antonyms As Synonyms (1)
- Apostrophes (1)
- Apposition (2)
- Bad Writing (9)
- Branding (2)
- Brevity (3)
- Bushisms (1)
- Business Writing (5)
- Buzzwords (7)
- Candor (1)
- Cliches (4)
- Colons (2)
- Commas (10)
- Connotation (11)
- Contractions (1)
- Economics Writing (1)
- Editing (12)
- Elegant Variation (3)
- Etymology (1)
- Exclamation Points (1)
- First-rate Writing (22)
- Fisking (2)
- Framing (5)
- Free Trade (1)
- Gerunds (1)
- Grammar (5)
- Headings (3)
- Headlines (7)
- Hidden Verbs (2)
- Homonyms (2)
- Hyperbole (1)
- Hyphens (3)
- Jargon (5)
- Journalism (1)
- Length (1)
- Lists (2)
- Loaded Language (6)
- Medicine (1)
- Metaphors (2)
- Names (1)
- Neologisms (31)
- News Releases (1)
- Nonlexical Terms (1)
- Notional Agreement (1)
- Nouns (2)
- Nouns As Verbs (11)
- Numbers (5)
- Parallelism (3)
- Participles (1)
- Passive Voice (1)
- Pedantry (3)
- Plain Language (5)
- Prepositions (2)
- Profanity (2)
- Pronouns (1)
- Proofreading (1)
- Punctuation (7)
- Puns (5)
- Rules (1)
- Science Writing (1)
- Shonda Rhimes (1)
- Singular-Plural Agreement (3)
- Sloppiness (3)
- Software (2)
- Spelling (6)
- Style (6)
- Subject-Verb Agreement (2)
- Synesis (1)
- Synonyms? (89)
- Tautologies (8)
- Technical Writing (1)
- That-which (1)
- Trademarks (3)
- Twitter (1)
- Typography (1)
- Typos (1)
- Vague Antecedents (1)
- Verbs (9)
- Visual Aids (1)
- Witty Definitions (3)
- Word of the Day (54)
- Writer's Block (2)
No comments:
Post a Comment